<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sense About Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/</link>
	<description>Entomology. Gardening. Ranting. Nerdery.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bible Versus and Gardens &#187; Sense About Science Bug Girl&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/#comment-17618</link>
		<dc:creator>Bible Versus and Gardens &#187; Sense About Science Bug Girl&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/#comment-17618</guid>
		<description>[...] Research more about this from here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Research more about this from here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowerpericles</title>
		<link>http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/#comment-9825</link>
		<dc:creator>lowerpericles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/#comment-9825</guid>
		<description>Is there any like Ministry of Health acknowledgment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any like Ministry of Health acknowledgment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peregrine</title>
		<link>http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/#comment-9730</link>
		<dc:creator>Peregrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://membracid.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/sense-about-science/#comment-9730</guid>
		<description>While I agree that there&#039;s a lot of crap out there that simply doesn&#039;t work as advertised, part of the problem is that people put too much credence into the claims of sales staff and customer service reps who very often either repeat what they&#039;re told, or make it up as they go along.

In these cases, the manufacturer&#039;s claims are probably bogus, or at least stretched a bit thin. But you can&#039;t always prove that by repeating the outlandish claims of a call center rep. Quite often these are just guys off the street working for regular pay check.  If they don&#039;t know the answer, they explain it as best as they can, which is very often watered down even more. And when that doesn&#039;t work, some of them will make crap up as they go along, or use vague analogies to sound more knowledgeable than they really are.  

If a scientist is talking to a layperson with a script and a supervisor looking over their shoulder, the scientist naturally has the upper hand, no matter how strong or weak the manufacturer&#039;s claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that there&#8217;s a lot of crap out there that simply doesn&#8217;t work as advertised, part of the problem is that people put too much credence into the claims of sales staff and customer service reps who very often either repeat what they&#8217;re told, or make it up as they go along.</p>
<p>In these cases, the manufacturer&#8217;s claims are probably bogus, or at least stretched a bit thin. But you can&#8217;t always prove that by repeating the outlandish claims of a call center rep. Quite often these are just guys off the street working for regular pay check.  If they don&#8217;t know the answer, they explain it as best as they can, which is very often watered down even more. And when that doesn&#8217;t work, some of them will make crap up as they go along, or use vague analogies to sound more knowledgeable than they really are.  </p>
<p>If a scientist is talking to a layperson with a script and a supervisor looking over their shoulder, the scientist naturally has the upper hand, no matter how strong or weak the manufacturer&#8217;s claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
