Insect warfare

I have a copy of the book “6-Legged Soldiers” and was hoping to review it later this year,soldiers but I got scooped by the author (or his publicist) who had the clever idea of promoting the book as an example of how terrorists could destroy us all.

Jeffrey Lockwood, an entomologist at the University of Wyoming, is on the talk show circuit to promote his new book, Six-legged Soldiers: Using Insects as Weapons of War. He told BBC Radio 4′s Today program that planning a bio-terror attack using insects would “probably be much easier” than developing nuclear or chemical weapons.

Now, I’m always happy when an entomology book makes the popular press, but this is the sort of fear mongering that is just not helpful. Not only will it result in more folks seeing insects as evil enemies, it feeds into the hysteria over terrorism that has eroded our civil liberties for the last 6 years.

Amusingly, some of the Rapture/The End Is Near crowd have seen this book as validation of some bizarre predictions in Revelations:

Revelations, Chapter 9: 3
And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.

Aside from insects as Apocalyptic 5th Horseman, is there anything to worry about? Probably not, as I’ll explain below, but I am troubled by some of the media coverage.

The book’s blurb (which is much quoted in press stories like the one above) describes the release of medflies in California as an example of recent ecoterrorism.  I’m afraid the medfly invasion is much more complex than they portray.

The initial medfly infestation was accidental, probably from infested fruit being imported. It was only once the government began public spraying programs with malathion that a group calling themselves “The Breeders” claimed to be releasing medflies.  Their idea was to make the government acknowledge the control was hopeless and stop spraying.  (Except, of course, they just sprayed more. Oops.)

Did the “Breeders” really release Medflies? There is circumstantial evidence that flies did show up in odd numbers in unexpected places.  One way to solve this question would be to examine the genetics of the population to see if it’s from one or multiple sources–alas, from a genetics review paper, that hasn’t been too successful:

The history of medfly invasions in California has been reviewed recently by several authors (MC PHERON et al. 1995; RODERICK 1996 B; G ASPARICH et al. 1997 ; HAYMER et al. 1997 ) but the origin(s) of these infestations remain uncertain and controversial.

So, there *might* have been ecoterrorism. But there also might not have been.
And a nuanced and complex story is pretty much doomed in today’s press coverage.

As for the thread of entomo-terrorism: personally, I think a far bigger threat to human health and agriculture is the movement by infected people on planes, or tourists bringing souvenirs home that are infected with potentially invasive pests. We’ll do it to ourselves. We don’t need terrorists.

Doctors in the US are going to need to be more broadly trained so they can recognize these uncommon diseases  when they arrive in the US.  From the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene:

“We live in a global community with mass import and export of food supplies and extensive travel to foreign lands for both business and pleasure,” explains Dr. Johnson. “Therefore, tropical medicine disease specialists are more important now than ever before….”

In my opinion, making sure that all humans, not just those in the US, have a healthy and humane life is probably the clearest path toward biosecurity.

Colbert, bees, and cows

I was just thinking “Gosh, we’ve been seriously lately at the Bug Blog….”

Fortunately, Steven Colbert weighs in on the bee-cocaine experiments! (At 2:12)
Bonus: before he gets to the honey, he explains how cow-tipping will help the environment.

Sadly, I can’t embed the Colbert video at WordPress, but you can click and visit.

He also covers the escape of a spider in space!

Posted in Bees, Entomology, Insects. Tags: , , . Comments Off

Ethics of copying unpublished data

You might remember that some time ago I expressed some concern about whether or not I should report on the papers given at the Entomological Society Annual Meeting.  The other ESA (Ecological Society of America) just published a paper on that very topic!

Patrick C. Tobin, James L. Frazier (2009) A Slide Down a Slippery Slope: Ethical Guidelines in the Dissemination of Computer-Based Presentations. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America: Vol. 90, No. 1, pp. 39-42.
doi: 10.1890/0012-9623-90.1.39

The authors argue that  downloading and publishing the data or figures from a presentation is off limits.  Since the Entomological Society now records and stores online the Annual Meeting presentations, this is not an unlikely issue.
Their guidelines:

“In particular, we specifically ask if the appropriate ethical behavior associated with the dissemination of scientific information, and particularly unpublished information, during scientific meetings, workshops, and other related events currently dominated by computer-based slide presentations is being handled in a manner consistent with the norms of printed materials….

1) All presentations are the intellectual property of the author(s); hence, computer slides shall never be downloaded by anyone else without the prior and explicit consent of the author(s).

2) Meeting organizers should accept formally and unequivocally all the responsibilities of hosting a scientific meeting, which includes ensuring that proper security protocols are in place to prevent unauthorized downloading to protect the integrity of the research process and uphold an ethical code of conduct.

3) Meeting organizers are encouraged to examine the use of modern computer-based tools to improve security measures during meetings….

4) If meeting organizers wish to develop a web site to host presentation files, then they must ask speakers to provide consent prior to the development of the web site and posting of slides. For example, this could be obtained from authors by asking them during the abstract submission process. In the absence of any written consent, however, then the assumption shall be that the posting or sharing of presentation files is forbidden.

5) We call upon Universities to require their students to perform coursework in ethical scientific conduct, and to ensure specifically that new or existing coursework is relevant to today’s technological tools.”

What do you think?

I know that some of the folks I’ve seen at meetings leave crucial bits of info off their talks–a talk about EAB pheromone, which is likely to be both lucrative and a hot paper–discussed techniques and results, but omitted the crucial chemical structure of the compound in questions.

How about posters? Is providing a printout of your poster implicit permission to write about it?

2008 Web Awards voting

The 2008 Web Awards are now open for voting! I’d like to encourage everyone to go to the Food Blog section and vote for Coffee and Conservation.   She’s up against some pretty big names, but I hope you’ll vote for C&C.

Every vote she gets will help raise the visibility of the very important issues surrounding sustainably-grown coffee.

Other Bloggy friends are nominated, too–

Orac is up in the Best Medical/Health Blog category, and the Best Comic Strip category has two great entries: Jesus and Mo, and xkcd.  (Alas, no Tree Lobster nomination!)

Several folks from the blogroll are in the Science category: Pharyngula (PZ Myers),  Bad Astronomy (Phil Plait), Neurologica (Steven Novella) and Greg Laden (Greg Laden).

In the Pet Blog Category, I Can Haz Cheezeburger is being trounced by a penguin. :(

You can vote once every 24 hours. Stuff that ballot box, people!

Posted in Food, Science, Skepticism. Tags: , , . Comments Off

Center For Science in the Public Interest: Taxonomy FAIL

The “Well Blog” at the New York Times had a post today about insects in food–and made the same, common error that drives me crazy:  getting the classification of the insect used to make Carmine, a pinkish dye, completely wrong. Compounding that error, though, they used this as an illustration:NOT a cochinealbug

That photo lead me to the source of their image–alas, the Taxonomy FAIL belongs to  The Center for Science in the Public Interest. [they have now removed the offending photo; you can see a screen shot here.]

That is a BEETLE. Not even remotely a scale insect, much less the actual Cochineal Scale Insect.

I’ll re-use the description of scale insects from this Vermont Extension publication:

“Scale insects are a peculiar group and look quite different from the typical insects we encounter day to day. Tiny, immobile, with no visible legs or antennae, they resemble individual fish scales pressed tightly against the plant on which they are feeding.”

I can’t make out where this original image is from, but DAMN. Someone’s Google-Fu is pretty sucky, when they can’t tell a scarab from a scale.

What do scale insects look like? This.  The proper species is Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell).  The beetle pictured above is probably at least 10 times bigger than these little bags of pigment and guts.

Even worse, the Times writer left a snotty remark for a commenter who tried to point out her taxonomic mistake. (The Times author used Wikipedia as a source. Egad.)

No, wait.
Even Even worse, CSPI goes on to call for a ban on these insects, which is a terrible idea.  The first part of their article is ok, if not entirely accurate:

After a decade-long gestation period, the Food and Drug Administration has finally ordered that food and cosmetics manufacturers that color their products with carmine and cochineal list them by name in ingredient lists. Until now, these colorings, extracted from the dried bodies of the tiny cochineal bug, have been hidden under the terms “artificial colors” or “color added.”

Cochineal and carmine are both labeled in food; it’s just optional. You can find foods with these labels on your shelf right now, and I am sure your lipstick has one of these pigments on its label.

Then CSPI goes on to say:

But, ideally, FDA should have exterminated these critter-based colorings altogether.

Ah, so cute. And so wrong. This insect is an important cash crop.  From an NPR story* about cochineal:

“Even though a full pound of cochineal sells for just $1.30, harvesting the bug earns enough money to feed and clothe a whole family in the impoverished highlands region of Peru. An estimated 40,000 Peruvian families depend on harvesting the bugs — which belong to a class of scale insects — to make a living.”

A very few individuals may be allergic to the compounds produced by these insects, and improved labeling is a good idea. But, frankly, I’ll take this over Red Dye #2 (derived from coal tar) any day!  Cochineal supports subsistence farmers in poor parts of the world, and is remarkably non-toxic.

The NYTimes article mostly seems freaked that there are bugs in food, period:

“the new rule contains one glaring omission. It doesn’t require companies to tell you that the ingredients come from a bug.”

OMGWTFBBQBUGS!

Yes, there is no requirement to explicitly state that carmine is derived from an insect.  Of course, the FDA also does not require Jell-O to reveal it’s made from pig hooves and tendons, or that rennet, a key component of cheese making, often comes from baby cow stomachs  (and sometimes ends up in your Mars Bar).

Of course, eating insects as a main dish is actually quite nutritious–but I don’t think that Times author is ready for Land Shrimp or other entomophagous treats.

————

*NPR got the taxonomy right. Neener.

Extraterrestrial Cows

I just love the internet. 20 years ago I only had random paper flyers to alert me of some of the crazier things that folks on the fringe believe.  alien cows!Now…they can register a domain, and spread the Good News to everyone!

So, to follow-up on the extraterrestrial mantids from last year, I bring you…Extraterrestrial COWS.

I can safely say I’ve never seen anything before that combines creationism, evolutionary biology, and livestock.

“Dr Mark Thomas, UCL published a paper in February 2007 revealing for the first time that Europeans developed the gene lactase which produces the enzyme lactase that digests the sugar lactose only 7000 years ago.  He assumed that cows must have been introduced to Europe from the Middle East around that time…
But does Dr Thomas, or any other scientist, have any evidence that there was a single cow on earth before this date?”

Indeed, the Shajara Code reveals:

Camels, cows, sheep and goats were created outside this planet and were brought down to the ape man ‘Adams’ after they were converted to intelligent beings. This Extraterrestrial Evolution serves three main purposes:

  1. It proves that all living beings on Earth evolved from one cell, the exception being the four ET creatures.
  2. The ‘cattle’ civilised the ape man and took him away from hunting wildlife, as they used to do before the conversion. Their presence was a key factor in the psychosocial development of the early intelligent man.
  3. The swift integration between the two ‘evolutions’ proves that it is all an Intelligent Divine Design, not spontaneous evolution.

Yep. The Shajara Code reveals everything on earth evolved from single celled organisms.
Except, you know, camels, cows, goats, and sheep.

Also, humans have an interesting evolutionary history, particularly women:

“The idea that the human race was started by incest between the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve has been a source of embarrassment to the scholars of the three faiths over the centuries. This book puts an end to this fallacy and proves from the Bible and Qur’an, without doubt, the following facts:

  1. Mankind evolved from one common origin along with the rest of the living beings on earth, i.e. plants and animals (The exception being the extraterrestrial cattle).
  2. All living beings ascended one evolutionary ladder that is governed by divinely designed laws (nature).
  3. Human evolution started as unisex and procreated asexually for millions of years.”

Also, Darwin died a Muslim, and was inspired to reveal the truth of evolution by God.  He is actually a holy man, chosen to reveal the nature of the Shajara Creation.

Just…wow.

The author of this “theory” is clearly not a stupid man. He has a medical degree, and an additional PhD in comparative religion. But…in the attempt to reconcile evolution and religion, he’s produced a profoundly loony explanation for life on earth.

When I learned about the idea of Cognitive Dissonance, I had an “Ah Ha! moment of my own.  It explained how so many of my students could see the evidence of evolution, and still not be persuaded.  In this case, a devout, intelligent man has crafted an explanation of evolved life that reconciles the many ideas he’s been exposed to, in a way that works for him.

I still don’t understand why the cows are aliens, though.

——-

*BTW, no word on whether this is related to the problem of alien cow abduction.

[thanks to MeraM for the cow astronaut image; UFO cows unsourced]

15 Evolutionary Gems

Nature has just released a free PDF file that summarizes some historic evidence for evolution:

Readers will find at http://www.nature.com/evolutiongems a freely accessible resource for biologists and others who wish to explain to students, friends or loved ones just what is the evidence for evolution by natural selection. Entitled ’15 evolutionary gems’, the document summarizes 15 lines of evidence from papers published in Nature over the past 10 years. The evidence is drawn from the fossil record, from studies of natural and artificial habitats, and from research on molecular biological processes.

Download your copy now!  Each “Gem” has a brief description, and then references to the primary research article that describes it.  It does not, however, contain the actual papers–you still have to have a subscription to Nature to see them.  Rats!

Re-greening Detroit?

I was really fascinated by this map, detroit sprawlwhich shows how very sprawled Detroit is, compared to other large metropolitan areas. From a Freep story:

“Detroit, where the population peaked at 2 million in the early 1950s, is home to about 900,000 today and is still losing people. The depopulation and demolition of abandoned properties has left the city dotted with thousands of vacant parcels, ranging from single home lots to open fields of many acres…

This abundance of vacant land has people talking about new uses, such as urban farming, reforesting the city, and large-scale recreational areas. Urban farming is getting the most buzz. “

What could be done with all that land?  If the current foreclosure and population losses continue, Detroit could be 50% vacant in the next 5 to 10 years.
I put that in bold, because it’s truly mind boggling.

MSU has a plan:

“Given the amount of open land, I think there’s a real opportunity for Detroit to provide a significant amount of its fruits and vegetables for its population and the surrounding area,” said Mike Hamm, the C.S. Mott Chair of Sustainable Agriculture at MSU.

Besides providing nutritional value for Detroiters, Hamm said, “I think it can help create jobs and some small businesses in the city, with the potential for spin-off businesses in processing and distribution.”

This could be a really cool experiment.  I really hope they can find funding and get the city to work with them.

Related posts:

Visual Migraine Aura–Illustrated!

I don’t talked a lot about my head issues, mainly since I find that telling people “Part of my brain came out my ear when I smashed my head in 1991!” can produce a wide variety of reactions, most of which are not positive.

Fortunately, my epilepsy has gotten a lot better, but I do have an ongoing problem with migraines. I have both regular migraines, and occasionally, cluster headaches.  Those are very, very bad.

I don’t always have a visual aura when I’m about to get a migraine, but sometimes I do–and someone has made a movie that illustrates what it’s like!

Finally I can explain to people what it’s like to have my vision go wonky.  Click and behold.

I’ll be back tomorrow, when my head feels better.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,205 other followers