Are there roaches in your coffee and chocolate?

Standard

The interwebs are abuzz from the NPR interview earlier this week with entomologist Douglas Emlen, who is a specialist on scarab beetles.  (And how funny is it that a discussion of Dung Beetles happened on a program called “Fresh Air”?!)

At about 34:00, he started telling some fun entomology stories–one of which ended with a statement that most mass-produced, pre-ground coffee, as well as chocolate, has roach parts in it.

For most entomologists or folks working in agriculture, this is not much of a shock. I have covered before how the FDA allows a wide variety of insect parts in most food products.

For some people, though, including interviewer Terri Gross, this clearly this was another case of OMGWTFBUGZINMAIFOODZ!  For those that aren’t afraid to know, here is the allowable amount of insects in chocolate and coffee beans:

Food Defect Action Level
CHOCOLATE AND CHOCOLATE LIQUOR Insect filth
(AOAC 965.38)
Average is 60 or more insect fragments per 100 grams when 6 100-gram subsamples are examined
OR
Any 1 subsample contains 90 or more insect fragments
COFFEE BEANS, GREEN
Insect Filth and Insects
Average 10% or more by count are insect-infested or insect-damagedDEFECT SOURCE: Insect fragments – post harvest and/or processing insect infestation

The action level means that if there are MORE than 60 insect fragments in 0.2 lbs of chocolate (100 grams, more or less), or MORE than 10% of the beans are damaged or infested, the food is rejected.

Both of these have the same FDA marking: SIGNIFICANCE: Aesthetic

In other words, it will not harm you to eat these insect parts. It simply Freaks. People. Out.
So FDA controls contamination below a noticeable level.

Americans like processed foods. However, there is a price for having someone else process stuff in bulk–some things will fall in that you might not want to know about.  (You SOOO do not ever want to go to a pickle factory. Trust me.)

We also like our food PERFECT–which means that producers have to use chemicals to make fruit perfectly shaped and unblemished, as well as using lots of preservatives to keep things lasting in their packages.

Sadly, as we have become more and more disconnected from nature, we become more convinced that the world should (and can be) made sterile and safe. That is utter bullshite.

Nature is dirty. Life is dirty. Poop, rats, and insects happen, despite everyone’s best efforts.

When we demand perfection, we create an unobtainable standard that results in tons of food wastage every year.

Are convenience, perfection, and sterility really the most important things to think about when choosing foods? What about how it was grown, or how many resources are used to package and ship it?  What about the welfare of the people who produced and manufactured it?  In the case of coffee and chocolate, these are not insignificant issues.

In the US, most of us actually have lots of choices about our food consumption–which of these might you choose?

  • Stop eating food that is pre-prepared and pre-packaged. That way you’ll know exactly what goes into your food.
  • Be willing to accept some damage to food (a blemish on your apple, bread without preservatives that goes moldy in a week) so that fewer chemicals are used in search of perfection.
  • If you can, join a community garden and learn how hard it is to grow food.  Discover that fruit with a little insect nibble on it still tastes pretty good.
  • Accept that insects will occasionally get into food, and that the convenience of having packaged food outweighs the knowledge that something with lots of legs might be in it.

List of Fair Trade coffee and chocolate companies

Related Posts:

Pollinator Action Alert: Farm Bill in Senate

Standard

I got an email recently from the Xerces Society about some senatorial action:

“Please contact your Senators and ask them to sign on to a letter by Senator Boxer in support of vital research on agricultural pollinators. …The deadline for Senators to sign on to this letter is Wednesday, May 6. Providing funding for research into the causes and remedies of honey bee and native bee declines is a critical step in pollinator conservation….

Senator Boxer has written a letter requesting that the Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee allocate $20 million in Fiscal Year 2010 for pollinator research projects as authorized in the 2008 Farm Bill….to promote the health of honey bees and native pollinators through habitat conservation and best management practices.”

There is some additional coverage of Boxer’s actions here; including blurbs from May Berenbaum!

You can download a free PDF of “Using Farm Bill Programs for Pollinator Conservation” at the Xerces site; it’s a joint USDA-NRCS-Xerces publication.  It discusses how existing farm programs (Conservation reserve, etc) can be used to promote native bee populations.

There’s also a PDF on building next boxes for native bees.  And, make sure you check out Anna’s new posts on her spring bees!  Pretty pictures! 

[Anna may or may not endorse the contents of this post; but had to link to Shiny! ]