Beetle Queen Conquers Tokyo

Beetle Queen PosterI *finally* got to see this movie, after waiting almost a year–it is now available on Netflix.  It was delightful, but not at all what I expected.

The Japanese have a profoundly different relationship with insects than Westerners.  This film examines why that is, and how insects are part of Japanese culture and history. We meet characters that range from a Ferrari-driving beetle dealer to little children caring for their 6-legged pets.

The LA Times described this movie as “a meditative piece that is by turns hypnotically beautiful and painfully slow.”  The director describes the movie as “about attention to detail, patience, and ultimately harmony – all of which are so rarely present in our modern lives.”   This film does not have a linear narrative or tell a story in the way we are used to Western movies conveying information. It’s not so much a documentary as a visual poem.

The contrast of busy Tokyo with the natural world; the J-pop sound track that alternates with insect songs; all of it contributes to a sense of paradox.  This movie feels like it’s dragging at points because we are too fast and impatient.

The film begins with this quote from a Westerner living in Japan in 1890:

“The people that could find delight, century after century, in watching the ways of insects, and in making verses about them, must have comprehended, better than we, the simple pleasures of existence.”  ~Lafcadio Hearn

Cross pollination of Zen Buddism and the native Shinto religion of Japan manifested as an aesthetic appreciation of insects in centuries of poems and music.   These spiritual roots created the philosophy of Kokugaku and “mono no aware“, sometimes translated as “the pathos of things.”    This philosophy emphasizes awareness and attention to the transience of all things, and appreciation of their beauty because of their fleeting nature.  What could be more transient than an insect, or the cycles of nature?

The film is narrated in Japanese, and the narrator has an amazing voice–you can listen to her reciting some poetry from the film here.  I especially liked this one:

Always more clear and shrill,
as the hush of the night grows deeper,
the Waiting-Insect’s voice;
- and I that wait in the garden,
feel enter into my heart
the voice and the moon together.

The only staged talking-head piece is an interview with author and anatomy professor Takeshi Yoro, who talks about his love for insects:

 ”If you have eyes to see and ears to hear, they will tell you something.”

Yes. Yes they will.

Shut off your computer and go outside.
Don’t come back until tomorrow.

Breakin’ Bees

I had no idea that when bees were doing the waggle dance, they were actually booty krumping. Shake it like a bee, girl!

BTW, the dancing beekeeper footage was lifted from this much more obnoxious Autotuned Bee Song.  The one redeeming feature is I’ve never seen a rasta dude in a bee suit before.

Ant-Man: The movie?

ant man comic bookSome time back I reported on a plan to convert the Ant Man comic into a movie.  Updates from Comic-Con suggest that movie is back in development!  It currently has a 2014 release date.

Ant-Man first appeared in 1962, and is described in a comic Wiki with this wonderful sentence:

With the help of his hexapoda allies Hank was able to stem the tide of most minor crimes. “

The basic Ant-Man plot line is, like most comics, convoluted and involves many different story arcs and reincarnations.  Hank Pym discovered a group of subatomic particles and produced two serums from them, one to reduce someone in size and another to restore them.  This allowed him to shrink to the size of an ant and return to normal shape.

He went on to develop a helmet that let him communicate and control ants, and became a crime fighter and one of the founding members of the Avengers.  (Sadly, he has been edited out of the Avengers movie to be released in 2012.  Speciesism!!)

He turned his girlfriend into an insecty sidekick (Wasp) and also had several nervous breakdowns and developed alter egos. I suppose as a physicist forced to constantly violate physical principles (conservation of matter, for one), that is to be expected.   About the only constant for Ant-Man over the years is that he seems to have been a bit of a perv, inclined to hide out in inconspicuous spots on women. Like… brassieres.

Do a Google search for images of “Ant-Man” or browse through the back issues of some of the comics online for much hilarious insecty action.

Anyway, back to the movie.   The director is Edgar Wright, and initial reports suggested Simon Pegg as the lead, which is just all sorts of flavors of awesome.

Mr Wright and Mr. Pegg:

simon pegg

I hereby offer my services as entomological consultant.

Spare your self the ignominy of The Bee Movie’s horrible fate (i.e., being mocked here and elsewhere for their utterly crap insect science.)

Accept professional help.  Hire an entomologist!

Other Insect Superheros:

Posted in Insects, Movies. Tags: . 2 Comments »

Does Google+ hate women?

Ok, that title is way over the top to get your attention.* BUT.banned from google
I do want to talk about what the “no pseudonyms” policy adopted at G+ means for women, LGBT folk, and civil servants.

There are many, many resources that can explain to Google why adopting this policy is a stupid idea (aside from the obvious business advantage of not alienating early adopters and potential G+ evangelists). One of the best can be found at the Geek Feminism Wiki:

The cost to these people {of denying pseudonym use} can be vast, including:

  • harassment, both online and offline
  • discrimination in employment, provision of services, etc.
  • actual physical danger of bullying, hate crime, etc.
  • arrest, imprisonment, or execution in some jurisdictions
  • economic harm such as job loss, loss of professional reputation, etc.
  • social costs of not being able to interact with friends and colleagues

That page goes on to list, in detail, the various ways that these groups can be harmed.   We know that women experience 25 TIMES the amount of harassment online that men do.  We know that 50% of LGBT teens are bullied online, and many of them consider–or commit–suicide.  We know that women are stalked and killed by ex-lovers. We know that LGBT folk are the victims of hate crimes.

Basically, we know that some people are assholes online, and like to target others and make their lives hell. They will do this using their real names; they do this with fake identities.   It’s about BEHAVIOR, not about names.  If your website is full of assholes, it’s your fault for not holding people–whatever name they go by–accountable for their behavior.  Online behavior doesn’t have to be polite or full of everyone agreeing with each other. Conversations just need to not be bigoted, hateful, or destructive.

If you agree that allowing pseudonyms online is important, please visit this petition and sign. It goes directly to Google.

My personal take:

I was banned from Google+ after happily using it for about a week, because I used my pseudonym as my name.  I’m not the only one–a bunch of other bloggers, all of whom have reasons to want to not reaveal their real names, or who, like Lady Gaga, have an alternative name that they are known by.  I have both professional and personal reasons to want to use my pseudonym Bug Girl online.

I can get my profile re-activated by giving Google my real name, and allowing it to be publicly linked with my profile.  But I’m not going to choose to out myself just because some giant world-ruling corporation demands it.   I have been Bug Girl online since at least 1997; as a blogger since 2005.  I initially adopted a pseudonym because I had been the target of some white supremacist groups in the 90s, as well as experiencing stalking.

Later I discovered that I had become a high-enough level civil servant that I was actually PROHIBITED, by law, from having opinions online.  I controlled enough of the state budget that my activities online, if connected to my real name, could be seen as lobbying.  It looks like my current job in Connecticut is going to be bound by the same rules.

I also only feel free to talk about my disability (I have epilepsy) and my status as a rape survivor under this pseudonym. I don’t want my students, my employer, or my mom to find out these secrets about me from Google.

How concerned am I about keeping my IRL name separate from Bug Girl? I am going to be giving a talk at the Entomological Society of America National meeting under the pseudonym of Bug Girl.  When an academic passes up a chance to pad her vita, you know she’s serious about plausible deniability.

Google is targeting people based on how “real” sounding their names are. Had I chosen a name that sounded more plausible, I would probably still be able to use Google+.  I know at least 5 people who put in fake names that are still happily using the service.  It’s a rule that can’t be applied consistently, and it blocks me from participating in a lot of wonderful online conversations.  Google+ is a really great platform, and I liked it a lot before I was evicted.

Google’s adopted a policy that puts people at risk and silences their voices in this new online forum.  Not because we have misbehaved, but because our privacy is important and we won’t give it up.  Google is a company that profits by serving you advertising on YouTube videos where  my friends are threatened with rape and death.  It is beyond hypocrisy for them to say they are concerned about online civility.

I have so many, many wonderful friends online as Bug Girl. I think I could go to just about any town in the world and find someone fun to have a conversation with that knows me as Bug.  I am constantly humbled by how kind and generous people online can be, and the realness of virtual communities.   Please sign the petition and help me share that with others.

(Oh, and make sure to click the Google+ button below! :)   )

Additional links:

*EDITED 7/24 TO ADD: People are getting hung up on the title of this post. It was a deliberately provocative title, but apparently a little too provocative. I have slightly altered it.  I drew a complete blank that afternoon when floundering for a title that would convey that Google had, once again, implemented a policy that would harm women and LGBT folks.

It’s too damn hot to blog

So how about another pretty photo?  It’s the time of the year for dog-day cicadas to sing, so this beautiful photo from French Guiana seems appropriate. It’s a biodiversity hot spot in South America I hope to visit one day.

Amazing camouflage on this cicada!  They have always been one of my favorite insects.

Thanks so much to Sean McCann (deadmike) for letting me use his photo!

Monday Montage

How about some pretty butterfly stamps for your morning? These are  from pixelschubser.de‘s photo stream.  Insects on stamps are pretty common, and there is a large review from 1990 in American Entomologist:

From 1892 to 1988, there have been 4,971 postage stamps depicting insects or their close allies issued by 289 countries from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. Collectors of these insect-related stamps are said to practice “entomophilately.“



Will Brazilian Waxing Make Pubic Lice Extinct?

Admit it–haven’t you wondered about this?  What IS the effect of all that hair removal down there on the local flora and fauna?  Fortunately, scientists have answered that question. Sort of. For women in Leeds, England.  (Maybe.)

Armstrong, N. (2006). Did the “Brazilian” kill the pubic louse? Sexually Transmitted Infections, 82 (3), 265-266 DOI: 10.1136/sti.2005.018671

graph of lice over timeI’ve seen this paper cited over and over, but what you don’t realize until you actually read it is that….it doesn’t actually have any significant conclusions.  The authors looked at the occurrence of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and pubic lice between 1997 and 2003 in people showing up at a public GYN clinic.  While clap and chlamydia increased significantly, the frequency of pubic lice declined significantly during the same period.

The graph itself is deceptive. The second Y axis actually shows the percentage decreasing from 0.5% of cases seen to 0.15% cases seen.  So, a rare thing got…more rare.  Additionally, all the numbers are reported as a percentage, so there is no information at all about just how many total cases we are looking at.  The total group seen has to be at least 200 people/year, since otherwise the percentages indicate sexually active headless torsos.  But we really have no idea if this is any sort of a representative sample of the general population.

There is a much larger issue with this study, however. They have no data on what the waxing rate is in either the population of women showing up in their clinic, or the population at large.  None. All they have is anecdotal stories that waxing became more popular during that time period.   So, they aren’t even able to show a correlation; they just speculated that there would be a correlation, if there was any data.

There is a certain logical beauty in linking the destruction of Ho-Ha forests by clear-cutting and the death of the native fauna.  (A crab louse paper from 1983 describes them as “swinging from hair to hair” rather like monkeys, BTW.)  However, there simply is no evidence for for a link between snatch waxing and pubic lice decline.

Honestly? I think the only reason this paper made it past the journal editors was because it was about pubic lice, and crotch crickets are inherently interesting because of the pastures they graze in.  (Which, of course, is exactly why -I- am writing about them!)

I did some investigating (in the library, pervs!) and found that there is actually data available on happy trail hair removal for women in the US and Australia.  The percentage of Australian college women who shaved their pudenda was around 48% during the same time period; but that means that the majority of women still had some or all of their original carpeting, whether or not it still matched the drapes.

We also know from a very detailed study of American women in 2010 that there is no dominant pattern to hair removal in the US. Women aged 18-24 were most likely of all age groups to have naked crotches, but even then only 38% of them were hair free down there.  Having a hairless muffin was actually the least common pattern of body hair in the over 2,450 women studied.  Additionally, removal of one’s No-No Fro was NOT related to having experienced an STD infection in that study–which strongly suggests that the sample used for the “Brazilian hypothesis” was not representative.

It is far too soon to say if pubic lice are an endangered species. I know that when I was teaching entomology regularly, at least one student a year would manage to collect a crab louse, so they are still out there.

As for me, I plan to keep my Map of Tasmania intact.  Hope that wasn’t overly sharing.

The Bee’s Knees

sign: bees kneesI love books, and I love words, so I was excited to find an website that specializes in breaking down the origins of common catch phrases.  Today’s phrase: The Bee’s Knees.

According to that site (and a few other sources), references to “bee knees” occasionally occurred in the early 1900′s:

 ’Bee’s knees’ began to be used in early 20th century America. Initially, it was just a nonsense expression that denoted something that didn’t have any meaningful existence…..That meaning is apparent in a spoof report in the New Zealand newspaper The West Coast Times in August 1906, which listed the cargo carried by the SS Zealandia as ‘a quantity of post holes, 3 bags of treacle and 7 cases of bees’ knees’…… Zane Grey’s 1909 story, The Shortstop, has a city slicker teasing a yokel by questioning him about make-believe farm products:

“How’s yer ham trees? Wal, dog-gone me! Why, over in Indianer our ham trees is sproutin’ powerful. An’ how about the bee’s knees? Got any bee’s knees this Spring?”

Pretty much everything I’ve read, though, agrees that the likely popularization of the phrase really occurred in the 1920′s, the period of the flappers.  ”Bee’s knees” is part of a fashion for nonsense rhyming slang from the Roaring 20s. The common feature of the slang expressions was mention of an animal part with some alliteration thrown in.  Some of my favorites:  ”elephant’s adenoids”, “caterpillar’s kimono”, “gnat’s elbows”, “kipper’s knickers”, and “eel’s ankle”.  You have probably heard another phrase that’s survived from that period:  ”The Cat’s Pajamas.”

All of these phrases generally translate to what, today, would be said as “Awesome!”  (Although I suspect there is a newer word for that, but I’m just too old and un-hip to know about it.)

The phrase occurs in print in several places in the US in 1922; Newspapers published “Flapper Dictionaries” to explain the strange and baffling lingo of those damn kids.   There is a reference to the term in a Flapper Dictionary from Missouri in 1922; The Newark Advocate, (Ohio) in a 1922 piece printed:

“That’s what you wonder when you hear a flapper chatter in typical flapper language. ‘Apple Knocker,’ for instance. And ‘Bees Knees.’ That’s flapper talk. This lingo will be explained in the woman’s page under the head of Flapper Dictionary.”

Alas, while the concept of the phrase referring to the collection of pollen on actual bees’ knees is appealing, it appears not to be the case.
If you want to have a fun 20′s flashback, here’s some Harold Lloyd driving around NYC.

Tell me what you want

I got the official notification of my time in the Social Media Symposium for the Entomological Society of America Annual Meeting. The official symposium:

Speak Out – Interaction and Education in a Brave New World of Social Media and Online Resources
Tuesday, November 15, 2011: 1:30 PM-5:45 PM

A lot of the symposium will focus on Extension, but there will also be some familiar names. Now that I’ve seen the lineup, I’m feeling a bit like “one of these things is not like the others.”

I’m the last person to talk, right after Eric Eaton. And honestly, I love Eric, but we could not be less alike.  The strongest language I think I’ve ever heard him use is “darn!”  (He may also have said “Blast!” once as well. But I don’t like to spread rumors.)

So, I am thinking of talking mostly about how to measure your impact, both with various social media metrics and intangibly. I hope to hit the one million mark on this blog before November, and that doesn’t even count the people who read my posts at Skepchick.   I also was thinking of talking about building a brand, or maybe the tradeoff between anonymity and a real name.

I have exactly 10 minutes to talk, so I can really only cover one topic. What do YOU want to hear about?

Leaping Cockroaches!

That’s not a quote from a Batman Episode; it’s a new species found in only one area in South Africa.  They were discovered by accident when two entomologists were sweep-netting a meadow. 

BOHN, H., M. PICKER, K.-D. KLASS & J. COLVILLE 2010.A jumping cockroach from South Africa, Saltoblattella montistabularis, gen. nov., spec. nov. (Blattodea: Blattellidae). - Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 68 (1): 53-69.

As you can see from these photos, the cockroaches have unusual hind legs that are modified for jumping, just like a grasshopper.  (The authors christened this animal the “leaproach”, although I would have lobbied for “cockhopper” myself.)

Now, I know that a lot of people don’t count roaches in their list of favorite insects.  So, a roach that can bound around like a kangaroo, which -I- think is really cool, is probably a nightmare for some.  Humans are most familiar with pest roaches, but those species only make up an estimated 1% of total roach diversity.  The rest of the 4000 species of roaches are benign, and often essential to ecosystem health.

Roaches have an amazing amount of modifications to the basic roachy body plan that let them survive in all sorts of environments.  There are diving roaches, sand-burrowing cockroaches, wood-eating roaches, and bioluminescent roaches.  Frustratingly, there is little information in the paper about why these leaproaches might have left scuttling behind for leaping.  The biggest hint is that they are found hopping around in grasslands during the day, pretty much side-by-side with grasshoppers.  Being able to jump long distances to avoid predators and find new food sources is handy for both grasshoppers and roaches.

Regular roaches can jump pretty well; the common German cockroach Blattella germanica can jump distances of 4 cm without any special leg modifications.  It’s not hard to imagine that day-active roaches that could jump a bit farther might be selected for over many generations.

cockhopper

Leaproaches are a really neat example of convergent evolution. Convergent evolution describes what happens when species that are distantly related–a grasshopper and a roach, for example–become more similar in appearance or structure because of natural selection.

Convergent evolution is the reason why a salmon, a shark, and a dolphin have similar body shapes, while they are not closely related taxonomically.  The physical environment they live in shaped their evolution in similar ways to solve similar problems–moving through an aquatic environment, in this example.

The  leaproach in this photo clearly has several body changes that are analogous with what you see on a grasshopper–primarily enlarged hind legs and big eyes.

Why not enlarged front legs? Well, if you want to go forward, the direction your eyes and other sensory organs are pointed, large jumpy front legs are not that helpful.  Hind legs help to propel you in the right direction, plus you have 4 legs you can reach out in front as you jump to grab onto passing stems of grass and hold on.

Similar environment, similar environmental constraints, and TA DA!  Leaproaches.  Neato!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,205 other followers