Are there roaches in your coffee and chocolate?

The interwebs are abuzz from the NPR interview earlier this week with entomologist Douglas Emlen, who is a specialist on scarab beetles.  (And how funny is it that a discussion of Dung Beetles happened on a program called “Fresh Air”?!)

At about 34:00, he started telling some fun entomology stories–one of which ended with a statement that most mass-produced, pre-ground coffee, as well as chocolate, has roach parts in it.

For most entomologists or folks working in agriculture, this is not much of a shock. I have covered before how the FDA allows a wide variety of insect parts in most food products.

For some people, though, including interviewer Terri Gross, this clearly this was another case of OMGWTFBUGZINMAIFOODZ!  For those that aren’t afraid to know, here is the allowable amount of insects in chocolate and coffee beans:

Food Defect Action Level
CHOCOLATE AND CHOCOLATE LIQUOR Insect filth
(AOAC 965.38)
Average is 60 or more insect fragments per 100 grams when 6 100-gram subsamples are examined
OR
Any 1 subsample contains 90 or more insect fragments
COFFEE BEANS, GREEN
Insect Filth and Insects
Average 10% or more by count are insect-infested or insect-damagedDEFECT SOURCE: Insect fragments – post harvest and/or processing insect infestation

The action level means that if there are MORE than 60 insect fragments in 0.2 lbs of chocolate (100 grams, more or less), or MORE than 10% of the beans are damaged or infested, the food is rejected.

Both of these have the same FDA marking: SIGNIFICANCE: Aesthetic

In other words, it will not harm you to eat these insect parts. It simply Freaks. People. Out.
So FDA controls contamination below a noticeable level.

Americans like processed foods. However, there is a price for having someone else process stuff in bulk–some things will fall in that you might not want to know about.  (You SOOO do not ever want to go to a pickle factory. Trust me.)

We also like our food PERFECT–which means that producers have to use chemicals to make fruit perfectly shaped and unblemished, as well as using lots of preservatives to keep things lasting in their packages.

Sadly, as we have become more and more disconnected from nature, we become more convinced that the world should (and can be) made sterile and safe. That is utter bullshite.

Nature is dirty. Life is dirty. Poop, rats, and insects happen, despite everyone’s best efforts.

When we demand perfection, we create an unobtainable standard that results in tons of food wastage every year.

Are convenience, perfection, and sterility really the most important things to think about when choosing foods? What about how it was grown, or how many resources are used to package and ship it?  What about the welfare of the people who produced and manufactured it?  In the case of coffee and chocolate, these are not insignificant issues.

In the US, most of us actually have lots of choices about our food consumption–which of these might you choose?

  • Stop eating food that is pre-prepared and pre-packaged. That way you’ll know exactly what goes into your food.
  • Be willing to accept some damage to food (a blemish on your apple, bread without preservatives that goes moldy in a week) so that fewer chemicals are used in search of perfection.
  • If you can, join a community garden and learn how hard it is to grow food.  Discover that fruit with a little insect nibble on it still tastes pretty good.
  • Accept that insects will occasionally get into food, and that the convenience of having packaged food outweighs the knowledge that something with lots of legs might be in it.

List of Fair Trade coffee and chocolate companies

Related Posts:

2008 Web Awards voting

The 2008 Web Awards are now open for voting! I’d like to encourage everyone to go to the Food Blog section and vote for Coffee and Conservation.   She’s up against some pretty big names, but I hope you’ll vote for C&C.

Every vote she gets will help raise the visibility of the very important issues surrounding sustainably-grown coffee.

Other Bloggy friends are nominated, too–

Orac is up in the Best Medical/Health Blog category, and the Best Comic Strip category has two great entries: Jesus and Mo, and xkcd.  (Alas, no Tree Lobster nomination!)

Several folks from the blogroll are in the Science category: Pharyngula (PZ Myers),  Bad Astronomy (Phil Plait), Neurologica (Steven Novella) and Greg Laden (Greg Laden).

In the Pet Blog Category, I Can Haz Cheezeburger is being trounced by a penguin. :(

You can vote once every 24 hours. Stuff that ballot box, people!